Monday, October 6, 2008

ASUS EAH2600XT/HTDP/256M



The ATI Radeon HD 2600 delivers a remarkable combination of DirectX 10 gaming performance and hardware processed 1080p video. Connect to big-screen TVs with HDMI including built-in 5.1 surround audio to enjoy Blu-ray and HD DVD movies. Unleash the HD visual effects within Windows Vista and DirectX 10. Plug-n-play CrossFire upgradeability makes it easy to scale up graphics performance to boost the most demanding games; and built-in multi-channel 5.1 surround audio over HDMI establishes a new level of entertainment designed for tech savvy gamers.

ASUS EN8600GT/HTDP/256M GeForce 8600GT


Model
Brand ASUS
Model EN8600GT/HTDP/256M
Interface
Interface PCI Express x16
Chipset
Chipset Manufacturer NVIDIA
GPU GeForce 8600GT
Core clock 540MHz
Stream Processors 32
Memory
Memory Clock 1400MHz
Memory Size 256MB
Memory Interface 128-bit
Memory Type GDDR3
3D API
DirectX DirectX 10
OpenGL OpenGL 2.0
Ports
DVI 2
TV-Out HDTV Out
VIVO No
General
Tuner None
RAMDAC 400 MHz
Max Resolution 2048 x 1536
SLI Supported Yes
Cooler With Fan
Windows Vista Certified for
Features
HDCP Ready Yes
Features Superior Cooling Efficiency - 14°c cooler than reference design boards!
HDCP Compliant
NVIDIA Quantum Technology - Advanced Shader Processors architected for physics computation
Packaging
Package Contents EN8600GT/HTDP/256M
Driver Disk
User Manual
HDTV Cable
DVI to VGA/D-sub Adapter
CD Wallet


Review
8600 GT cards is proven to provide nice price/performance ratio. SLI capable and provide adequate gameplay for latest games for a mere $120. The fan looks solidly built yet will not consume many space inside the case.

XFX GeForce 8600GT 256 Mb DDR3 PVT84JUDD3


VIEW THIS PRODUCT IN AMAZON FOR BEST PRICE!
Model
Brand XFX
Model PVT84JUDD3
Interface
Interface PCI Express x16
Chipset
Chipset Manufacturer NVIDIA
GPU GeForce 8600GT
Core clock 620MHz
Memory
Memory Clock 1600MHz
Memory Size 256MB
Memory Interface 128-bit
Memory Type GDDR3
3D API
DirectX DirectX 10
OpenGL OpenGL 2.0
Ports
DVI 2
TV-Out HDTV Out
VIVO No
General
Tuner None
RAMDAC 400 MHz
Max Resolution 2560 x 1600
RoHS Compliant Yes
SLI Supported Yes
Cooler With Fan
Dual-Link DVI Supported Yes
Features
Features Full Microsoft DirectX 10 Support
NVIDIA Lumenex Engine
Packaging
Package Contents PVT84JUDD3
Driver Disk
User Manual
S-Video Cable
DVI to VGA/D-sub Adapter


Review
The reason I make this review is for those of us who would like DirectX 10 capable graphic while short in budget or refuse to pay for an 8800 series card at its current high prices. I understand that these two card are in different classes and that, is the point. If you are considering making this change from a nVidia 7950 to an 8600 GT simply to have DirectX 10 you may want to reconsider. You WILL sacrifice in overall performance. Also keep in mind that your processor and RAM will drastically effect any video card. Most DirectX 10 games coming out in near future will rely more on dual core processor and 2 Gb of RAM for use in high graphics settings. In my opinion, wait until you can afford what you really want/need. But if you come from ultra low end graphic cards and need significant improvement in graphic performance, 8600 GT is the one of the best solution out there.

This card was incredibly easy to install. I downloaded latest drivers from the XFX website (the disc was an older version of drivers), then uninstall old graphic card drivers in add/remove hardware, shut down, pull the old card, add new card, startup, point manually to new drivers. Total Time=15-20 minutess! This card is VERY quiet... even though I came from a passive (no fan) video setup GF7300, the fan on this is SUPER quiet... I can barely hear it. I even had to verify visually if the fan is really even moving, it really quiet! I try Battlefield 2142 with most settings on High which yield 60-70 fps at 1024x768 and at 40-50 FPS at 1280x1024 (using +szx 1280 +szy 1024).

MSI NX8600GT-T2D256E OC


Model
Brand MSI
Model NX8600GT-T2D256E OC
Interface
Interface PCI Express x16
Chipset
Chipset Manufacturer NVIDIA
GPU GeForce 8600GT
Core clock 580MHz
Memory
Memory Clock 1600MHz
Memory Size 256MB
Memory Interface 128-bit
Memory Type GDDR3
3D API
DirectX DirectX 10
OpenGL OpenGL 2.0
Ports
DVI 2
TV-Out HDTV / S-Video Out
VIVO No
General
Tuner None
RAMDAC 400 MHz
Max Resolution 2560 x 1600
SLI Supported Yes
Cooler With Fan
Dual-Link DVI Supported Yes
Features
Features NVIDIA CineFX 5.0 Shading Architecture
NVIDIA Intellisample 4.0 Technology
NVIDIA UltraShadow II Technology
NVIDIA PureVideo Technology
Packaging
Package Contents NX8600GT-T2D256E OC
HDTV Cable
S-Video Cable
2 x DVI to VGA/D-sub Adapter



Review
I achieved 63 fps average in Half-Life 2: Lost Coast @1440x900, max details with 8xAF and 4xAA and vertical sync ON! At the same time 44 fps reached with 7600GT and 49 fps with 7900GS at the same settings..and water and HDR lighting look much better than nVidia 7000 series. 128-bit memory makes no difference as it outperforms the 7900GS which had 256-bit DDR3

Diamond 9250 256 Mb S9250PCI256SB



Model
Brand DIAMOND
Model S9250PCI256SB
Interface
Interface PCI
Chipset
Chipset Manufacturer ATI
GPU Radeon 9250
PixelPipelines 4
Memory
Memory Size 256MB
Memory Interface 128-bit
Memory Type DDR
3D API
DirectX DirectX 8
OpenGL OpenGL
Ports
D-SUB 1
DVI 1
TV-Out S-Video Out
VIVO No
General
Tuner None
Max Resolution 2048 x 1536
RoHS Compliant Yes
Cooler With Fan
Operating Systems Supported Windows 2000/XP
Packaging
Package Contents S9250PCI256SB
2 x Driver Disk
S-Video Cable


Review
I bought this for a relative who desperately needed an upgrade from his GeForce MX400 256MB PCI. His motherboard lacked any AGP or PCIe slots, so finding a good PCI card that was also relatively inexpensive was wonderful. He's had it for nearly four months at the time of this review, and it outperforms ATI Radeon 9200 512MB AGP card by a high margin. I would definitely drop the cash to buy another one for any ultra-cheap PC rig.

Monday, September 15, 2008

XFX 7950 GX2 Quad SLI

XFX 7950 GX2 Quad SLI Review


Features of the XFX 7950 GX2 Quad SLI Graphics Cards

No Master Card Required

Unlike ATI's CrossFire neither Quad SLI nor normal SLI require a special master card to work. You simply get two Nvidia graphics cards that use the same GPU along with a SLI mainboard and compatible motherboard and you are ready to do SLI. Your graphics cards don't even need to have the same clock speeds as evidenced by this review. I am using an XFX 7950 GX2 XXX and an XFX 7950 GX2 Extreme edition for this review. The cards sport the same GPU, but different GPU and memory clock speeds. Moral of the story is so long as your GPUs are the same you can run SLI.

Specifications

I have reviewed the XFX 7950 GX2 XXX graphics card previously and you can see that full review here. The second graphics card in my Quad SLI rig is the XFX 7950 GX2 Extreme edition that is identical to the XXX version, save slight lower core clock speed of 520 MHz and memory speed of 1.3 GHz. I won't go over the other many features off the XFX 7950 GX2 here again, read the previous review for the gory details.

XFX 7950 GX2 Quad SLI in Use

Test System Specs

My test system for the Quad SLI review has the following specs:

  • CPU: AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+
  • Mainboard: Asus M2N32-SLI Deluxe
  • RAM: OCZ PC2 8000 4-4-4-8 2 x 1GB
  • Graphics Cards: 1x XFX 7950 GX2 XXX; 1x XFX 7950 GX2 Extreme
  • PSU: PC Power & Cooling TurboCool 1KW
  • HDD: Seagate 750GB
  • Sound Card: Creative X-Fi
  • Display: Eizo CE240W 24" LCD
  • Display Driver: ForceWare 91.45

Bench Marks

Since I have reviewed the XFX 7950 GX2 XXX graphics card individually before, this time around for the quad SLI review I will just talk about the Quad SLI tests. I chose to use my standard bench suite consisting of Fear, Quake 4 and 3DMark06.

Fear

The first test I ran was Fear. With the review of the ATI X1900 CrossFire rig fresh in my mind, I wanted to see how Nvidia's new beastie measured up to ATI's offering. I allowed Fear to choose the settings for the first run and ended up with the following settings:

  • Single player physics: Med
  • Multiplayer physics: Med
  • Software sounds: Med
  • Particle bouncing: Med
  • Shell casings: On
  • World detail: Max
  • Corpse detail: Max
  • Effects details: Max
  • Model decals: Max
  • Water resolution: Med
  • Reflections & displays: Max
  • Volumetric lights: On
  • Volumetric light density: Med
  • FSAA: Off
  • Light detail: Max
  • Enable shadows: On
  • Soft shadow: Off
  • Texture filter: AF 4x
  • Texture resolution: Max
  • Video resolution: Med
  • Resolution: 1024 x 768
  • Shader: Max
At these settings the Quad SLI beast laughed in the face of Fear proving the only thing to Fear is Quad SLI. The minimum frame rate at these settings was 45 FPS, average frame rate was 101 FPS and the maximum frame rate was 218 FPS. Never once did the frame rates dip below the magic 40 FPS number.

Naturally with Quad SLI being the best graphics platform around and Fear being one of the most taxing games around on hardware, I turned everything to the max and ran the test loop again at 1600 x 1200. XFX's 7950 GX2 Quad SLI rig kicked Fear squarely in the testes with a fully maxed out setting run again never once dipping below 40 FPS! That's right Fear with everything on ran on the Quad SLI rig with a minimum frame rate of 45 FPS, average frame rate of 88 frickin' FPS and a max frame rate of 192 FPS!

3DMark06

For you synthetic fans out there Quad SLI again handed ATI the shortest time for a 3DMark06 record in my lab, beating it soundly right after the X1900 Crossfire review. XFX's Quad SLI rig burned through 3DMark06 at default settings and scored 8448 3DMarks. The details broke out like this:

  • Return to Proxycon: 32.301
  • firefly forest: 33.222
  • Deep Freeze: 41.018
  • CPU1: 0.613
  • CPU2: 0.960
To test the rig at my displays native resolution of 1920 x 1200 I ran 3DMark06 again at that resolution with all other settings the same. The final score was 7178 3DMarks!

Quake 4

The final benchmark that I ran on the XFX 7950 GX2 Quad SLI rig was Quake 4. I ran quake 4 at ultra quality with AA of 8x and AF of 4x, SMP enabled at a resolution of 1024 x 768 for the first test run. The average frame rate at these settings was 129.3 FPS. For the final Quake 4 test I ran the game at 1920 x 1200 with all other settings the same. The average frame rate was 41.1 FPS.

XFX NVIDIA 8800 GTX SLI

XFX NVIDIA 8800 GTX

XFX NVIDIA 8800 GTX

XFX NVIDIA 8800 GTX
benchmarks for the 8800 GTX SLI system. The test machine uses the following components:
  • CPU- Intel X6800
  • RAM- Crucial PC2 8000 2 x 1GB
  • HDD- 1x 74GB Raptor, 1x 750 GB Seagate
  • Mainboard: EVGA nForce 680i
  • PSU: Top Power 1000W

For the benchmarks I used 3DMark06, FEAR, Oblivion and Battlefield 2142. The first test up was 3DMark06 with the following results ran at defaults on 3DMark and defaults in the NVIDIA control panel as well.

  • Total 3DMarks- 13,012
  • SM2.0- 5866
  • HDR/SM3- 7018
  • CPU- 2492
  • Return to Proxycon- 47.769
  • Firefly Forest- 49.990
  • Canyon Flight- 78.886
  • Deep Freeze- 61.469
  • CPU1- 0.0796
  • CPU2- 1.249

To compare a single 8800 GTX on the same system, save for an abit AW9D-Max mainboard scored 10,355 3DMarks.

The next test I ran was with Battlefield 2142. BF2142 is a very popular game that while not overtly taxing for hardware really scales well performance wise for different graphics cards. Gamers that play BF2142 on slow machines and have to turn their settings down might as well be playing a different title graphics wise that the gamer that runs BF2142 maxed out. For this test I ran the game at max settings with the NVIDIA control panel set to 16x AA and 16xQ AF at a screen resolution of 1920 x 1200 and all game settings at max. The frame rates were recorded with FRAPS and are as follows:

  • Min- 47
  • Avg- 58
  • Max- 74

I noticed no problems whatsoever in the game play at these seriously high settings. Everything ran as smooth and fluid as it would at 640 x 480 on lesser rigs.

The next game title that I tested with was FEAR. FEAR is a very demanding game title graphically. For this test I turned all in game settings to max at 1920 x 1200 screen resolution and used 16x AA and 16xQ AF from the NVIDIA control panel. These setting would be impossible on any other gaming machine, but not so on my 8800 GTX system, look at this frame rate data:

  • Min- 31
  • Avg- 50
  • Max- 93

Those numbers are phenomenal even more so when you stop to think the settings I am using here for testing are actually higher than what the game alone can run. I could have played FEAR all night at these settings and never had a problem with frame rates.

Normally I don’t test with Oblivion, but for grins I started in up at the same super high settings of 1920 x 1200, 16x AA and 16xQ AF in an outdoor environment with lots of water, trees and moving grass. I was floored to get frame rates with 8800 GTX SLI that I typically get on other machines with settings a much lower levels, Fraps recorded an average frame rate of a bit over 43 frames per second. Most machines struggle to run Oblivion at that frame rate running at medium settings.

Overall, XFX 8800 GTX SLI will play any game about there at settings higher than what you can get in the game alone and not blink and eye. There is no doubt that this is the best performing graphics platform ever. Nothing else on the market comes close to the performance you can get with a pair of XFX 8800 GTX graphics cards in your gaming machine.